Transfer-pricing treatment of ITeS margins excludes pass-through tax recoveries and separate delayed-receivables interest after working-capital adjust...
Capacity-utilisation adjustments under TNMM can neutralise substantiated COVID-related idle costs where underutilisation materially affects profitabil...
TNMM functional comparability requires excluding rice manufacturers from a pure Basmati rice trader's benchmark and recognising operating export recei...
Working-capital adjustment subsumes delayed-receivable effects in TNMM benchmarking of captive software-development services, avoiding separate notion...
Transfer-pricing comparability requires exclusion of financially illogical super-profit comparables and correction of unsupported annual-report and ma...
Charitable character assessment preserves Section 80G approval despite inclusive spiritual teachings and incidental religious expenditure within the s...
Penalty proceedings for cash-loan acceptance require assessment proceedings and recorded Assessing Officer satisfaction; absent these, the proceedings...
Page of 4828
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
161 to 180 of 96556 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
ITAT allowed the appeal, holding that the Assessing Officer's addition of notional interest on interest-free mobilization and additional advances was unsustainable. Clause 6 obliged the assessee to provide a 15% interest-free mobilization advance recoverable pro rata from the Principal EPC Contractor's bills, and further advances were similarly recoverable. CIT(A) found on ledger evidence that about 95% of the mobilization and additional advances were recovered by 30.09.2017 and the balance settled by 01.12.2019. The tribunal accepted that interest incurred on bank borrowings was capitalised into project cost and amortised over the concession period, concluding no taxable notional income arose and the impugned addition must be deleted.
ITAT allowed the appeal, holding that the Assessing Officer's addition of notional interest on interest-free mobilization and additional advances was unsustainable. Clause 6 obliged the assessee to provide a 15% interest-free mobilization advance recoverable pro rata from the Principal EPC Contractor's bills, and further advances were similarly recoverable. CIT(A) found on ledger evidence that about 95% of the mobilization and additional advances were recovered by 30.09.2017 and the balance settled by 01.12.2019. The tribunal accepted that interest incurred on bank borrowings was capitalised into project cost and amortised over the concession period, concluding no taxable notional income arose and the impugned addition must be deleted.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.