Charitable trust registration requires a specified-violation notice; settled cash deposits and related-party payments did not justify cancellation or ...
External development charges trigger TDS under section 194C, while disputed administrative payments require factual verification and fresh adjudicatio...
Section 270AA penalty immunity requires identified statutory defaults and a hearing before rejection; reassessment disclosure may constitute under-rep...
Section 80JJAA employee-cost deduction allowed for deployed staff but barred against transfer-pricing income enhancement, with pricing issues remanded...
Page of 4830
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
141 to 160 of 96587 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NCLAT dismissed the appeal, affirming the Adjudicating Authority's classification of the Appellant as an unsecured financial creditor. The Tribunal held that the arbitral award's Clause V, which restrained the Corporate Debtor by injunction from allotting, alienating or creating third-party interests, did not create a statutory "security interest" under the IBC; the Arbitrator had not adjudicated whether the Articles of Agreement constituted a charge within the IBC scheme. The CoC's subsequent adjustment (security interest recorded as nil) was upheld, as homebuyers holding allotments are unsecured creditors and the Appellant's claim lacked proof of a perfected security interest. No error was found in the impugned order; appeal dismissed.
NCLAT dismissed the appeal, affirming the Adjudicating Authority's classification of the Appellant as an unsecured financial creditor. The Tribunal held that the arbitral award's Clause V, which restrained the Corporate Debtor by injunction from allotting, alienating or creating third-party interests, did not create a statutory "security interest" under the IBC; the Arbitrator had not adjudicated whether the Articles of Agreement constituted a charge within the IBC scheme. The CoC's subsequent adjustment (security interest recorded as nil) was upheld, as homebuyers holding allotments are unsecured creditors and the Appellant's claim lacked proof of a perfected security interest. No error was found in the impugned order; appeal dismissed.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.