Alternative statutory remedy and unexplained delay barred writ review of customs confiscation adjudication, leaving merits for appellate consideration...
Authorised courier due diligence protects against penalties where declared exports conceal prohibited goods despite proper documentation and customs p...
Customs-controlled container movement now extends to DP World facilities, subject to segregation, inspections, reconciliation, and EXIM cargo priority...
NCLAT dismissed the appeal, affirming the Adjudicating Authority's classification of the Appellant as an unsecured financial creditor. The Tribunal held that the arbitral award's Clause V, which restrained the Corporate Debtor by injunction from allotting, alienating or creating third-party interests, did not create a statutory "security interest" under the IBC; the Arbitrator had not adjudicated whether the Articles of Agreement constituted a charge within the IBC scheme. The CoC's subsequent adjustment (security interest recorded as nil) was upheld, as homebuyers holding allotments are unsecured creditors and the Appellant's claim lacked proof of a perfected security interest. No error was found in the impugned order; appeal dismissed.
NCLAT dismissed the appeal, affirming the Adjudicating Authority's classification of the Appellant as an unsecured financial creditor. The Tribunal held that the arbitral award's Clause V, which restrained the Corporate Debtor by injunction from allotting, alienating or creating third-party interests, did not create a statutory "security interest" under the IBC; the Arbitrator had not adjudicated whether the Articles of Agreement constituted a charge within the IBC scheme. The CoC's subsequent adjustment (security interest recorded as nil) was upheld, as homebuyers holding allotments are unsecured creditors and the Appellant's claim lacked proof of a perfected security interest. No error was found in the impugned order; appeal dismissed.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.