Transaction value rejection requires reliable corroboration; refundable VAT is excluded and temporary registration does not defeat new-vehicle exempti...
Appellate jurisdiction remains available where a wrist-worn gold ornament cannot conclusively be characterised as imported baggage at the preliminary ...
Page of 4803
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
381 to 400 of 96046 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
The HC allowed the petition and set aside the impugned administrative order dated 25-12-2023 and the Demand-cum-Show Cause Notice dated 05-12-2022, holding that amendments effected by the Finance (No.2) Act, 2024-given retrospective effect from 01-07-2017-have rendered proceedings against the petitioner redundant. The court applied amended Section 16 of the CGST Act, 2017 (including newly incorporated sub-sec. (5)), observing that notwithstanding sec. 16(4), a registered person may avail Input Tax Credit for invoices/debit notes pertaining to FY 2017-18 through 2020-21 by filing any return under sec. 39 up to 30 Nov 2021. Petition disposed.
The HC allowed the petition and set aside the impugned administrative order dated 25-12-2023 and the Demand-cum-Show Cause Notice dated 05-12-2022, holding that amendments effected by the Finance (No.2) Act, 2024-given retrospective effect from 01-07-2017-have rendered proceedings against the petitioner redundant. The court applied amended Section 16 of the CGST Act, 2017 (including newly incorporated sub-sec. (5)), observing that notwithstanding sec. 16(4), a registered person may avail Input Tax Credit for invoices/debit notes pertaining to FY 2017-18 through 2020-21 by filing any return under sec. 39 up to 30 Nov 2021. Petition disposed.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.