Patent-settlement expenditure treated as commercially expedient revenue outlay, with foreign-law restrictions inapplicable before the prospective amen...
International transaction benchmarking restricts transfer pricing adjustments to associated-enterprise dealings, while functional comparability govern...
Joint development agreements defer taxable transfer where possession lacks part performance, while completed flats determine consideration and exempti...
HC disposed the writ directing that the petitioner, whose GST registration was cancelled under s.29(2)(c) for failure to file returns for six months, may seek restoration by approaching the concerned empowered officer within two months. If the petitioner submits an application complying with the proviso to sub-rule (4) of Rule 22 of the CGST Rules and furnishes all pending returns and pays outstanding tax with applicable interest and late fees, the empowered officer has jurisdiction to drop proceedings and pass an appropriate order in the prescribed form restoring registration. The petition is disposed of on these terms, leaving the decision to the statutory authority acting in accordance with law.
HC disposed the writ directing that the petitioner, whose GST registration was cancelled under s.29(2)(c) for failure to file returns for six months, may seek restoration by approaching the concerned empowered officer within two months. If the petitioner submits an application complying with the proviso to sub-rule (4) of Rule 22 of the CGST Rules and furnishes all pending returns and pays outstanding tax with applicable interest and late fees, the empowered officer has jurisdiction to drop proceedings and pass an appropriate order in the prescribed form restoring registration. The petition is disposed of on these terms, leaving the decision to the statutory authority acting in accordance with law.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4803
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
