Development agreements require legal possession or effective enjoyment for capital gains transfer; permissive possession and deferred consideration de...
Prolonged sterilisation of development rights supports capital-gains treatment, while business-income disallowances cannot govern capital-gains comput...
Additional evidence in transfer pricing dispute leads to fresh examination, while tax deductions, TDS credit, fee and refund interest require verifica...
Category II AIF pass-through taxation preserves non-business income character; investment receipts cannot be reclassified without applying recognised ...
The HC dismissed the writ petition filed by the petitioner challenging issuance of DRC-01, holding that the department did not accept the petitioner's initial reply and issued DRC-01; once the petitioner files a substantive reply to DRC-01 the department must pass a detailed, speaking order explaining reasons for any rejection. The court declined to adjudicate the underlying tax adjustment dispute at this interim stage and refused relief, but granted the petitioner liberty to file a reply to DRC-01 within two weeks of receipt of the order. On receipt, respondents must consider and decide the matter by a reasoned order within four weeks. Petition dismissed.
The HC dismissed the writ petition filed by the petitioner challenging issuance of DRC-01, holding that the department did not accept the petitioner's initial reply and issued DRC-01; once the petitioner files a substantive reply to DRC-01 the department must pass a detailed, speaking order explaining reasons for any rejection. The court declined to adjudicate the underlying tax adjustment dispute at this interim stage and refused relief, but granted the petitioner liberty to file a reply to DRC-01 within two weeks of receipt of the order. On receipt, respondents must consider and decide the matter by a reasoned order within four weeks. Petition dismissed.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.