Development agreements require legal possession or effective enjoyment for capital gains transfer; permissive possession and deferred consideration de...
Prolonged sterilisation of development rights supports capital-gains treatment, while business-income disallowances cannot govern capital-gains comput...
Additional evidence in transfer pricing dispute leads to fresh examination, while tax deductions, TDS credit, fee and refund interest require verifica...
Category II AIF pass-through taxation preserves non-business income character; investment receipts cannot be reclassified without applying recognised ...
ITAT allowed the assessee's appeal, holding that the AO exceeded jurisdiction by converting a limited scrutiny into a de facto complete assessment and making additions without proper mandate; those additions were therefore unsustainable. On exemption under section 54F, the Tribunal found the assessee had deposited and utilized the entire capital gains sum pursuant to the prescribed scheme within the statutory three-year period for construction, and administrative delays in final approvals and physical completion did not defeat the beneficial object of section 54F. Consequently the section 54F exemption was recognised and the impugned addition reversed.
ITAT allowed the assessee's appeal, holding that the AO exceeded jurisdiction by converting a limited scrutiny into a de facto complete assessment and making additions without proper mandate; those additions were therefore unsustainable. On exemption under section 54F, the Tribunal found the assessee had deposited and utilized the entire capital gains sum pursuant to the prescribed scheme within the statutory three-year period for construction, and administrative delays in final approvals and physical completion did not defeat the beneficial object of section 54F. Consequently the section 54F exemption was recognised and the impugned addition reversed.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4805
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
