Development agreements require legal possession or effective enjoyment for capital gains transfer; permissive possession and deferred consideration de...
Prolonged sterilisation of development rights supports capital-gains treatment, while business-income disallowances cannot govern capital-gains comput...
Additional evidence in transfer pricing dispute leads to fresh examination, while tax deductions, TDS credit, fee and refund interest require verifica...
Category II AIF pass-through taxation preserves non-business income character; investment receipts cannot be reclassified without applying recognised ...
ITAT held the assessment void for want of jurisdiction because notice under s.143(2) was never served on the assessee (notice returned undelivered and no subsequent notice issued before the cut-off). The Tribunal rejected reliance on service by speed post where actual service did not occur and found the proviso to s.292BB inapplicable, thereby negating any deemed service under the main limb of s.292BB. Consequently the assessment completed without a jurisdictional s.143(2) notice was set aside and the appeal by the assessee was allowed, with the assessment nullified for lack of jurisdiction.
ITAT held the assessment void for want of jurisdiction because notice under s.143(2) was never served on the assessee (notice returned undelivered and no subsequent notice issued before the cut-off). The Tribunal rejected reliance on service by speed post where actual service did not occur and found the proviso to s.292BB inapplicable, thereby negating any deemed service under the main limb of s.292BB. Consequently the assessment completed without a jurisdictional s.143(2) notice was set aside and the appeal by the assessee was allowed, with the assessment nullified for lack of jurisdiction.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4805
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
