Inherited property sale proceeds require capital-gains treatment where ownership is supported by evidence, not suspicion or unverified signature doubt...
Cross-examination of retracted statements is essential where foundational evidence supports a benami allegation and documented funding explanations re...
Capital-goods exemption covers plant-modernisation accessories, while the import restriction applies only to earlier capital-goods components and spar...
Constitutional judicial review permits challenges to ECIRs and connected money-laundering proceedings where coercive action affects fundamental intere...
ITAT held the assessment void for want of jurisdiction because notice under s.143(2) was never served on the assessee (notice returned undelivered and no subsequent notice issued before the cut-off). The Tribunal rejected reliance on service by speed post where actual service did not occur and found the proviso to s.292BB inapplicable, thereby negating any deemed service under the main limb of s.292BB. Consequently the assessment completed without a jurisdictional s.143(2) notice was set aside and the appeal by the assessee was allowed, with the assessment nullified for lack of jurisdiction.
ITAT held the assessment void for want of jurisdiction because notice under s.143(2) was never served on the assessee (notice returned undelivered and no subsequent notice issued before the cut-off). The Tribunal rejected reliance on service by speed post where actual service did not occur and found the proviso to s.292BB inapplicable, thereby negating any deemed service under the main limb of s.292BB. Consequently the assessment completed without a jurisdictional s.143(2) notice was set aside and the appeal by the assessee was allowed, with the assessment nullified for lack of jurisdiction.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4794
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
