Commercial vehicle depreciation, scientifically determined warranty provisions and exempt-income disallowances were resolved in favour of the taxpayer...
Inherited property sale proceeds require capital-gains treatment where ownership is supported by evidence, not suspicion or unverified signature doubt...
Cross-examination of retracted statements is essential where foundational evidence supports a benami allegation and documented funding explanations re...
The ITAT upheld the AO's disallowance under section 292C, finding no contemporaneous claim of expenses or liabilities during the survey and dismissing the assessee's Ground No.2; the addition stands. The Tribunal directed recalculation of allowable partners' remuneration under section 40(b) (Explanation 3) by computing book profit after adding back confirmed additions of Rs. 62,28,947 and adhoc disallowances of Rs. 15,620, and ordered the AO to allow the remuneration claim accordingly. The Bench held that income declared during survey is taxable as business income under section 28, hence section 115BBE, and provisions applicable to deemed unexplained credits are not attracted.
The ITAT upheld the AO's disallowance under section 292C, finding no contemporaneous claim of expenses or liabilities during the survey and dismissing the assessee's Ground No.2; the addition stands. The Tribunal directed recalculation of allowable partners' remuneration under section 40(b) (Explanation 3) by computing book profit after adding back confirmed additions of Rs. 62,28,947 and adhoc disallowances of Rs. 15,620, and ordered the AO to allow the remuneration claim accordingly. The Bench held that income declared during survey is taxable as business income under section 28, hence section 115BBE, and provisions applicable to deemed unexplained credits are not attracted.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.