Independent show-cause notices remain separate proceedings, while customs adjudication challenges should ordinarily follow the statutory appellate rem...
Institutional incapacity in customs settlement proceedings excludes non-functional quorum periods from statutory disposal timelines, preventing automa...
Interactive touchscreen panels with integrated computing functions fall under automatic data-processing machines rather than display monitors for cust...
Ex parte injunction service requirements were substantially met, while civil recovery and SFIO investigation into provident fund defalcation continued...
Enforcement of resolution-plan directions continues without a Supreme Court stay, preventing suspension of redistribution and escrowed-fund distributi...
Third-party ownership claims over attached property require Special Court adjudication where purchasers lack registered sale deeds and bona fides rema...
Page of 4796
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
301 to 320 of 95918 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
ITAT affirmed the CIT(A)'s order and dismissed Departmental appeals for AYs 2014-15, 2015-16 and 2016-17, rejecting reclassification of short-term capital gains (initially taxed under s.111A) as unexplained income under s.68 read with s.115BBE. The Tribunal found the AO's factual premises illusory and his change of opinion unjustified absent any proper inquiry, and placed weight on final SEBI acquittal orders which eliminated the AO's suspicions regarding genuineness of share transactions. Given the tax effect was below the Rs.60 lakh threshold and no allegation of organized accommodation entries, the ITAT declined to disturb the well-reasoned appellate order and dismissed the appeals.
ITAT affirmed the CIT(A)'s order and dismissed Departmental appeals for AYs 2014-15, 2015-16 and 2016-17, rejecting reclassification of short-term capital gains (initially taxed under s.111A) as unexplained income under s.68 read with s.115BBE. The Tribunal found the AO's factual premises illusory and his change of opinion unjustified absent any proper inquiry, and placed weight on final SEBI acquittal orders which eliminated the AO's suspicions regarding genuineness of share transactions. Given the tax effect was below the Rs.60 lakh threshold and no allegation of organized accommodation entries, the ITAT declined to disturb the well-reasoned appellate order and dismissed the appeals.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.