Allow deduction under s.36(1)(vii) for accounting write-offs; delete s.36(1)(iii) disallowances on business interest including advances to related ent...
Assessee entitled to depreciation on slump-sale goodwill; s.43(1)/43(6 explanations inapplicable; goodwill and non-compete amortisation treated as non...
AT dismissed the appeal challenging a provisional attachment order under the PMLA, holding that the impugned properties constituted proceeds of crime derived from scheduled offences involving fraudulent loan obtainment. The Tribunal found the underlying decree was obtained ex parte, the bank suffered pecuniary loss, and a prima facie quid pro quo nexus existed through a contrived chain of transfers among interconnected accounts. Transfers to an intermediary and subsequent conveyance to the Appellant were held to be sham, with consideration routed back the same day, evidencing an attempt to disguise illicit receipts. Consequently the attachment was sustained as lawful and the appellate challenge unsustainable, and the appeal was dismissed.
AT dismissed the appeal challenging a provisional attachment order under the PMLA, holding that the impugned properties constituted proceeds of crime derived from scheduled offences involving fraudulent loan obtainment. The Tribunal found the underlying decree was obtained ex parte, the bank suffered pecuniary loss, and a prima facie quid pro quo nexus existed through a contrived chain of transfers among interconnected accounts. Transfers to an intermediary and subsequent conveyance to the Appellant were held to be sham, with consideration routed back the same day, evidencing an attempt to disguise illicit receipts. Consequently the attachment was sustained as lawful and the appellate challenge unsustainable, and the appeal was dismissed.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4830 
Join Channel 
