Retention of seized property survives where recorded reasons support proceeds of crime, while stayed investigation periods are excluded from limitatio...
Specified income of Baddi Barotiwala Nalagarh Development Authority receives conditional tax exemption, retrospectively covering its designated assess...
Specified development authority income receives retrospective tax exemption, subject to non-commercial activity, unchanged income sources, and return-...
Unified Brand India framework introduces voluntary Trust Mark certification and funding support for export branding, packaging and global promotional ...
Origin Declaration authentication governs preferential tariff claims under India-UK CETA, requiring a validated reference number before import clearan...
Separate assessment orders for different years remain valid when distinct notices and hearing opportunities prevent prejudice from combined proceeding...
The HC dismissed the review insofar as it does not disturb the impugned cancellation of the Petitioner's GST registration and instead recorded systemic concerns about fictitious firms, impersonation and notarized affidavits executed without client verification. The Court observed recurring misuse of accountant/GST practitioner referrals to procure registrations in stolen identities and noted parallel findings in related matters. No adverse findings were made against the Advocate on record due to full disclosure of the referral chain. The Registry was directed to communicate this order to the Standing Counsel (Criminal) and to list the matter for further consideration on the specified date for procedural compliance and any remedial directions.
The HC dismissed the review insofar as it does not disturb the impugned cancellation of the Petitioner's GST registration and instead recorded systemic concerns about fictitious firms, impersonation and notarized affidavits executed without client verification. The Court observed recurring misuse of accountant/GST practitioner referrals to procure registrations in stolen identities and noted parallel findings in related matters. No adverse findings were made against the Advocate on record due to full disclosure of the referral chain. The Registry was directed to communicate this order to the Standing Counsel (Criminal) and to list the matter for further consideration on the specified date for procedural compliance and any remedial directions.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4805
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
