Charitable trust registration requires a specified-violation notice; settled cash deposits and related-party payments did not justify cancellation or ...
External development charges trigger TDS under section 194C, while disputed administrative payments require factual verification and fresh adjudicatio...
Section 270AA penalty immunity requires identified statutory defaults and a hearing before rejection; reassessment disclosure may constitute under-rep...
Section 80JJAA employee-cost deduction allowed for deployed staff but barred against transfer-pricing income enhancement, with pricing issues remanded...
Transfer-pricing methodology protects commercially genuine associated-enterprise payments, while pre-2016 secondary adjustments and related notional i...
Negative liens over operating assets can constitute international transactions requiring arm's-length pricing reflecting restricted borrowing and expa...
Cross-examination rights in Customs Broker revocation inquiries require witness examination; procedural denial may be cured through fresh adjudication...
ITAT vacated and set aside the addition of Rs. 5.19 crore made by the AO under ss. 69A/69C, holding that the impugned quantitative discrepancies in purchases, sales and closing stock arose from the AO's failure to appreciate that the opening stock of the parent item included branded sub-stock, and from adoption of distorted figures. The Tribunal found the assessee's VAT return summaries corroborated the reported purchases and sales for FY 2016-17 and concluded the AO's adverse inferences lacked basis. Consequently, the CIT(A)'s order sustaining the addition was quashed and the appeal of the assessee was allowed, with the impugned assessment addition vacated.
ITAT vacated and set aside the addition of Rs. 5.19 crore made by the AO under ss. 69A/69C, holding that the impugned quantitative discrepancies in purchases, sales and closing stock arose from the AO's failure to appreciate that the opening stock of the parent item included branded sub-stock, and from adoption of distorted figures. The Tribunal found the assessee's VAT return summaries corroborated the reported purchases and sales for FY 2016-17 and concluded the AO's adverse inferences lacked basis. Consequently, the CIT(A)'s order sustaining the addition was quashed and the appeal of the assessee was allowed, with the impugned assessment addition vacated.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4828 
Join Channel 
