Charitable trust registration requires a specified-violation notice; settled cash deposits and related-party payments did not justify cancellation or ...
External development charges trigger TDS under section 194C, while disputed administrative payments require factual verification and fresh adjudicatio...
Section 270AA penalty immunity requires identified statutory defaults and a hearing before rejection; reassessment disclosure may constitute under-rep...
Section 80JJAA employee-cost deduction allowed for deployed staff but barred against transfer-pricing income enhancement, with pricing issues remanded...
Transfer-pricing methodology protects commercially genuine associated-enterprise payments, while pre-2016 secondary adjustments and related notional i...
Negative liens over operating assets can constitute international transactions requiring arm's-length pricing reflecting restricted borrowing and expa...
Cross-examination rights in Customs Broker revocation inquiries require witness examination; procedural denial may be cured through fresh adjudication...
AT affirmed the Adjudicating Authority's finding that the transaction was benami, holding that funds advanced by the beneficial owner to effect purchase were consideration, not a genuine loan to the benamidar, and thus upheld the Provisional Attachment Order. The tribunal found admissions that the alleged loan of Rs. 15,10,000 remained unpaid, inconsistent financial statements and ITRs undermining the appellant's capital-account defense, and that statutory restrictions necessitated entry in the benamidar's name. Having concluded the property was acquired for the future benefit of the beneficial owner and not pursuant to a bona fide loan or tripartite arrangement, AT dismissed the appeals and refused to interfere with the impugned order.
AT affirmed the Adjudicating Authority's finding that the transaction was benami, holding that funds advanced by the beneficial owner to effect purchase were consideration, not a genuine loan to the benamidar, and thus upheld the Provisional Attachment Order. The tribunal found admissions that the alleged loan of Rs. 15,10,000 remained unpaid, inconsistent financial statements and ITRs undermining the appellant's capital-account defense, and that statutory restrictions necessitated entry in the benamidar's name. Having concluded the property was acquired for the future benefit of the beneficial owner and not pursuant to a bona fide loan or tripartite arrangement, AT dismissed the appeals and refused to interfere with the impugned order.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4828 
Join Channel 
