Charitable trust registration requires a specified-violation notice; settled cash deposits and related-party payments did not justify cancellation or ...
External development charges trigger TDS under section 194C, while disputed administrative payments require factual verification and fresh adjudicatio...
Section 270AA penalty immunity requires identified statutory defaults and a hearing before rejection; reassessment disclosure may constitute under-rep...
Section 80JJAA employee-cost deduction allowed for deployed staff but barred against transfer-pricing income enhancement, with pricing issues remanded...
Transfer-pricing methodology protects commercially genuine associated-enterprise payments, while pre-2016 secondary adjustments and related notional i...
Negative liens over operating assets can constitute international transactions requiring arm's-length pricing reflecting restricted borrowing and expa...
Cross-examination rights in Customs Broker revocation inquiries require witness examination; procedural denial may be cured through fresh adjudication...
CESTAT declined jurisdiction over appeals filed by appellant-importers challenging an order of the Commissioner of Central Excise and Customs, Surat-I, concerning alleged overvaluation of exported goods and fraudulent availment of export incentives. The Tribunal held the cause of action arose from adjudication by an authority situated outside the Bench's territorial jurisdiction and noted that the Ahmedabad Bench was already seised of related appeals on the merits. Applying the principle of comity of courts, the Tribunal considered it appropriate to refrain from entertaining the lis. The Registry was directed to place the matter before the President to constitute a special Bench to hear and decide the appeals; appeals disposed accordingly.
CESTAT declined jurisdiction over appeals filed by appellant-importers challenging an order of the Commissioner of Central Excise and Customs, Surat-I, concerning alleged overvaluation of exported goods and fraudulent availment of export incentives. The Tribunal held the cause of action arose from adjudication by an authority situated outside the Bench's territorial jurisdiction and noted that the Ahmedabad Bench was already seised of related appeals on the merits. Applying the principle of comity of courts, the Tribunal considered it appropriate to refrain from entertaining the lis. The Registry was directed to place the matter before the President to constitute a special Bench to hear and decide the appeals; appeals disposed accordingly.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4828 
Join Channel 
