Specialized Investment Fund distribution now requires dedicated certification, while transitional recognition preserves existing qualified distributor...
Overlapping GST proceedings require Central and State authorities to designate one competent authority for coordinated adjudication of the same matter...
Composite healthcare supplies retain exemption when patient care is the contract's essential character, despite payment through an implementing agency...
The HC set aside the ex parte assessment order dated 21 February 2025 passed under s.73 of the GST Act against the petitioner, finding failure of service of statutory notices (GST ASMT-10/ASMT-11) and denial of opportunity to be heard contrary to principles of natural justice. The writ petition was disposed directing the relevant authority to serve the outstanding documents upon the petitioner within seven days and afford an opportunity to file replies/explanations; further proceedings under s.73 are to proceed thereafter in accordance with law. The order compels fresh adjudication only after valid service and compliance with hearing requirements.
The HC set aside the ex parte assessment order dated 21 February 2025 passed under s.73 of the GST Act against the petitioner, finding failure of service of statutory notices (GST ASMT-10/ASMT-11) and denial of opportunity to be heard contrary to principles of natural justice. The writ petition was disposed directing the relevant authority to serve the outstanding documents upon the petitioner within seven days and afford an opportunity to file replies/explanations; further proceedings under s.73 are to proceed thereafter in accordance with law. The order compels fresh adjudication only after valid service and compliance with hearing requirements.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4805
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
