Patent-settlement expenditure treated as commercially expedient revenue outlay, with foreign-law restrictions inapplicable before the prospective amen...
International transaction benchmarking restricts transfer pricing adjustments to associated-enterprise dealings, while functional comparability govern...
Joint development agreements defer taxable transfer where possession lacks part performance, while completed flats determine consideration and exempti...
Passenger baggage re-export requires true declaration and cannot be granted indirectly through discretionary redemption of undeclared prohibited goods...
The HC set aside the ex parte assessment order dated 21 February 2025 passed under s.73 of the GST Act against the petitioner, finding failure of service of statutory notices (GST ASMT-10/ASMT-11) and denial of opportunity to be heard contrary to principles of natural justice. The writ petition was disposed directing the relevant authority to serve the outstanding documents upon the petitioner within seven days and afford an opportunity to file replies/explanations; further proceedings under s.73 are to proceed thereafter in accordance with law. The order compels fresh adjudication only after valid service and compliance with hearing requirements.
The HC set aside the ex parte assessment order dated 21 February 2025 passed under s.73 of the GST Act against the petitioner, finding failure of service of statutory notices (GST ASMT-10/ASMT-11) and denial of opportunity to be heard contrary to principles of natural justice. The writ petition was disposed directing the relevant authority to serve the outstanding documents upon the petitioner within seven days and afford an opportunity to file replies/explanations; further proceedings under s.73 are to proceed thereafter in accordance with law. The order compels fresh adjudication only after valid service and compliance with hearing requirements.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4801
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
