Transaction value rejection requires reliable corroboration; refundable VAT is excluded and temporary registration does not defeat new-vehicle exempti...
Appellate jurisdiction remains available where a wrist-worn gold ornament cannot conclusively be characterised as imported baggage at the preliminary ...
Written complaint requirement bars cognizance on police reports for securities offences, while unsupported breach of trust and cheating allegations fa...
Page of 4801
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
341 to 360 of 96001 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
The HC directed the Respondent Department to re-credit the Petitioner's Input Tax Credit (ITC) of Rs. 23,32,278/- to the Petitioner's Electronic Credit Ledger within four weeks, permitting manual intervention if necessary, upon finding no dispute as to entitlement and that non-credit arose solely from a technical limitation of the GST portal preventing issuance of PMT-03. The court held that the refund cannot be withheld on account of the technical impediment and ordered immediate compliance with the re-crediting directive. The petition is disposed of accordingly.
The HC directed the Respondent Department to re-credit the Petitioner's Input Tax Credit (ITC) of Rs. 23,32,278/- to the Petitioner's Electronic Credit Ledger within four weeks, permitting manual intervention if necessary, upon finding no dispute as to entitlement and that non-credit arose solely from a technical limitation of the GST portal preventing issuance of PMT-03. The court held that the refund cannot be withheld on account of the technical impediment and ordered immediate compliance with the re-crediting directive. The petition is disposed of accordingly.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.