Ratification of resignation acceptance validates separation retrospectively, while withdrawal may be refused through reasoned administrative discretio...
Nature-dependent electricity contracts receive new Ind AS accounting, hedge designation, transition and financial-statement disclosure requirements fr...
Alternative GST remedy permitted protective writ intervention for ex parte adjudication, preserving independent appellate review of input tax credit d...
Assessment against deceased sole proprietor requires proceedings against the legal representative, rendering prior assessment and appellate orders inv...
Residential waste collection classification under SAC 999423 defeats composite-supply exemption where facilitating goods are not transferred to the lo...
Page of 4800
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
161 to 180 of 96000 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
The HC allowed the petition and quashed the seizure order and related proceedings. The court found the E-way bill accompanied the conveyance and, although the delivery challan was not initially produced at interception, it was furnished prior to the seizure order and accepted by the first appellate authority as lawfully issued under the GST regime. No finding of tax evasion was recorded against the petitioner, and ownership of the excavator by the petitioner was undisputed. Because the statutory documents were validly issued and no evasion was shown, the impugned action was held vitiated and was set aside, with the petition accordingly allowed.
The HC allowed the petition and quashed the seizure order and related proceedings. The court found the E-way bill accompanied the conveyance and, although the delivery challan was not initially produced at interception, it was furnished prior to the seizure order and accepted by the first appellate authority as lawfully issued under the GST regime. No finding of tax evasion was recorded against the petitioner, and ownership of the excavator by the petitioner was undisputed. Because the statutory documents were validly issued and no evasion was shown, the impugned action was held vitiated and was set aside, with the petition accordingly allowed.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4800
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
