Transfer pricing requires evidence for AMP transactions, functionally reliable comparables, and appropriate aggregation or Berry Ratio benchmarking me...
Revisionary jurisdiction cannot reopen share capital assessments where adequate inquiry supports a permissible view and no independent error is establ...
Reassessment jurisdiction fails where unverified portal information is aggregated without examining the taxpayer's explanation or relevance of entries...
Statutory sanction for delayed reassessment requires approval from the prescribed authority; approval by an inferior authority invalidates jurisdictio...
Transfer pricing margin adjustments require matching treatment of non-operating income and related costs, with comparability issues reconsidered on ev...
Preliminary-expense amortisation and MAT exempt-income adjustments prevailed, while trademark costs and managerial remuneration require fresh verifica...
Export valuation requires contemporaneous evidence; unrelated invoices cannot prove overvaluation, and dual penalties on firm and partner are impermis...
The HC allowed the petition and quashed the seizure order and related proceedings. The court found the E-way bill accompanied the conveyance and, although the delivery challan was not initially produced at interception, it was furnished prior to the seizure order and accepted by the first appellate authority as lawfully issued under the GST regime. No finding of tax evasion was recorded against the petitioner, and ownership of the excavator by the petitioner was undisputed. Because the statutory documents were validly issued and no evasion was shown, the impugned action was held vitiated and was set aside, with the petition accordingly allowed.
The HC allowed the petition and quashed the seizure order and related proceedings. The court found the E-way bill accompanied the conveyance and, although the delivery challan was not initially produced at interception, it was furnished prior to the seizure order and accepted by the first appellate authority as lawfully issued under the GST regime. No finding of tax evasion was recorded against the petitioner, and ownership of the excavator by the petitioner was undisputed. Because the statutory documents were validly issued and no evasion was shown, the impugned action was held vitiated and was set aside, with the petition accordingly allowed.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4800
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
