Appeal allowed, exemption under section 11 restored for not-for-profit company under section 12A carrying out charitable activities including micro-fi...
The HC allowed the petition and quashed the seizure order and related proceedings. The court found the E-way bill accompanied the conveyance and, although the delivery challan was not initially produced at interception, it was furnished prior to the seizure order and accepted by the first appellate authority as lawfully issued under the GST regime. No finding of tax evasion was recorded against the petitioner, and ownership of the excavator by the petitioner was undisputed. Because the statutory documents were validly issued and no evasion was shown, the impugned action was held vitiated and was set aside, with the petition accordingly allowed.
The HC allowed the petition and quashed the seizure order and related proceedings. The court found the E-way bill accompanied the conveyance and, although the delivery challan was not initially produced at interception, it was furnished prior to the seizure order and accepted by the first appellate authority as lawfully issued under the GST regime. No finding of tax evasion was recorded against the petitioner, and ownership of the excavator by the petitioner was undisputed. Because the statutory documents were validly issued and no evasion was shown, the impugned action was held vitiated and was set aside, with the petition accordingly allowed.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4828 
Join Channel 
