Transfer-pricing treatment of ITeS margins excludes pass-through tax recoveries and separate delayed-receivables interest after working-capital adjust...
Capacity-utilisation adjustments under TNMM can neutralise substantiated COVID-related idle costs where underutilisation materially affects profitabil...
TNMM functional comparability requires excluding rice manufacturers from a pure Basmati rice trader's benchmark and recognising operating export recei...
Working-capital adjustment subsumes delayed-receivable effects in TNMM benchmarking of captive software-development services, avoiding separate notion...
Transfer-pricing comparability requires exclusion of financially illogical super-profit comparables and correction of unsupported annual-report and ma...
Charitable character assessment preserves Section 80G approval despite inclusive spiritual teachings and incidental religious expenditure within the s...
Penalty proceedings for cash-loan acceptance require assessment proceedings and recorded Assessing Officer satisfaction; absent these, the proceedings...
Page of 4828
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
161 to 180 of 96556 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
HC held that the assessee's "booking rights" and the resultant capital asset accrued only on execution of the Buyer's Agreement dated 4.11.2004, not on earlier confirmation correspondence; the confirmation letter explicitly disclaimed any grant of provisional/final allotment or title and thus did not create transferable rights. Accordingly, the date of acquisition for capital gains purposes is the date of the Buyer's Agreement, entitling the assessee to indexation calculated from that acquisition date as applicable, and the challenge did not raise any substantial question of law.
HC held that the assessee's "booking rights" and the resultant capital asset accrued only on execution of the Buyer's Agreement dated 4.11.2004, not on earlier confirmation correspondence; the confirmation letter explicitly disclaimed any grant of provisional/final allotment or title and thus did not create transferable rights. Accordingly, the date of acquisition for capital gains purposes is the date of the Buyer's Agreement, entitling the assessee to indexation calculated from that acquisition date as applicable, and the challenge did not raise any substantial question of law.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.