Transfer-pricing methodology protects commercially genuine associated-enterprise payments, while pre-2016 secondary adjustments and related notional i...
Negative liens over operating assets can constitute international transactions requiring arm's-length pricing reflecting restricted borrowing and expa...
Cross-examination rights in Customs Broker revocation inquiries require witness examination; procedural denial may be cured through fresh adjudication...
Governmental authority status supports construction-service exemption, while pre-cutoff contract and stamp-duty compliance requires verification on re...
Automated Free Sale and Commerce Certificates enable paperless processing while retaining risk-based manual verification for selected exporter applica...
Page of 4830
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
161 to 180 of 96587 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
ITAT allowed the taxpayer's appeal, holding that the sanction issued under section 151(i) for issuance of notice under section 148 and consequential order under section 148A(d) (post three years) was infirm; the correct sanction ought to have been under section 151(ii). Consequently, the reassessment proceedings under section 147 were vitiated. The Principal Commissioner of Income-tax, in exercise of revisionary jurisdiction under section 263, lacked competence to set aside a non-est reassessment order and to direct the Assessing Officer to pass a fresh assessment. The revision order was quashed and the reassessment proceedings held invalid.
ITAT allowed the taxpayer's appeal, holding that the sanction issued under section 151(i) for issuance of notice under section 148 and consequential order under section 148A(d) (post three years) was infirm; the correct sanction ought to have been under section 151(ii). Consequently, the reassessment proceedings under section 147 were vitiated. The Principal Commissioner of Income-tax, in exercise of revisionary jurisdiction under section 263, lacked competence to set aside a non-est reassessment order and to direct the Assessing Officer to pass a fresh assessment. The revision order was quashed and the reassessment proceedings held invalid.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.