Governmental authority status supports construction-service exemption, while pre-cutoff contract and stamp-duty compliance requires verification on re...
Automated Free Sale and Commerce Certificates enable paperless processing while retaining risk-based manual verification for selected exporter applica...
Employee stock-shortage penalties do not constitute consideration for services, preventing GST collection under Schedule II in employment relationship...
ITAT allowed the taxpayer's appeal, holding that the sanction issued under section 151(i) for issuance of notice under section 148 and consequential order under section 148A(d) (post three years) was infirm; the correct sanction ought to have been under section 151(ii). Consequently, the reassessment proceedings under section 147 were vitiated. The Principal Commissioner of Income-tax, in exercise of revisionary jurisdiction under section 263, lacked competence to set aside a non-est reassessment order and to direct the Assessing Officer to pass a fresh assessment. The revision order was quashed and the reassessment proceedings held invalid.
ITAT allowed the taxpayer's appeal, holding that the sanction issued under section 151(i) for issuance of notice under section 148 and consequential order under section 148A(d) (post three years) was infirm; the correct sanction ought to have been under section 151(ii). Consequently, the reassessment proceedings under section 147 were vitiated. The Principal Commissioner of Income-tax, in exercise of revisionary jurisdiction under section 263, lacked competence to set aside a non-est reassessment order and to direct the Assessing Officer to pass a fresh assessment. The revision order was quashed and the reassessment proceedings held invalid.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4828 
Join Channel 
