Charitable trust registration requires a specified-violation notice; settled cash deposits and related-party payments did not justify cancellation or ...
External development charges trigger TDS under section 194C, while disputed administrative payments require factual verification and fresh adjudicatio...
Section 270AA penalty immunity requires identified statutory defaults and a hearing before rejection; reassessment disclosure may constitute under-rep...
Section 80JJAA employee-cost deduction allowed for deployed staff but barred against transfer-pricing income enhancement, with pricing issues remanded...
Transfer-pricing methodology protects commercially genuine associated-enterprise payments, while pre-2016 secondary adjustments and related notional i...
Negative liens over operating assets can constitute international transactions requiring arm's-length pricing reflecting restricted borrowing and expa...
Cross-examination rights in Customs Broker revocation inquiries require witness examination; procedural denial may be cured through fresh adjudication...
ITAT allowed the taxpayer's appeal, holding that the sanction issued under section 151(i) for issuance of notice under section 148 and consequential order under section 148A(d) (post three years) was infirm; the correct sanction ought to have been under section 151(ii). Consequently, the reassessment proceedings under section 147 were vitiated. The Principal Commissioner of Income-tax, in exercise of revisionary jurisdiction under section 263, lacked competence to set aside a non-est reassessment order and to direct the Assessing Officer to pass a fresh assessment. The revision order was quashed and the reassessment proceedings held invalid.
ITAT allowed the taxpayer's appeal, holding that the sanction issued under section 151(i) for issuance of notice under section 148 and consequential order under section 148A(d) (post three years) was infirm; the correct sanction ought to have been under section 151(ii). Consequently, the reassessment proceedings under section 147 were vitiated. The Principal Commissioner of Income-tax, in exercise of revisionary jurisdiction under section 263, lacked competence to set aside a non-est reassessment order and to direct the Assessing Officer to pass a fresh assessment. The revision order was quashed and the reassessment proceedings held invalid.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.