Governmental authority status supports construction-service exemption, while pre-cutoff contract and stamp-duty compliance requires verification on re...
Automated Free Sale and Commerce Certificates enable paperless processing while retaining risk-based manual verification for selected exporter applica...
Employee stock-shortage penalties do not constitute consideration for services, preventing GST collection under Schedule II in employment relationship...
ITAT (Third-Member) held that the impugned addition under s.68 in the assessee's hands must be deleted because identical cash-credit income had already been assessed in the hands of other entities, and the tax code does not permit double taxation on the same passage of money. The Judicial Member's view that once the amount is taxed in one entity the Assessing Officer cannot make a duplicate addition in another was affirmed by the Third Member; the dissenting Administrative Member's call for fresh merits adjudication was rejected. Consequent to the Third-Member opinion, the Revenue's appeal is dismissed and the addition in the assessee's hands deleted.
ITAT (Third-Member) held that the impugned addition under s.68 in the assessee's hands must be deleted because identical cash-credit income had already been assessed in the hands of other entities, and the tax code does not permit double taxation on the same passage of money. The Judicial Member's view that once the amount is taxed in one entity the Assessing Officer cannot make a duplicate addition in another was affirmed by the Third Member; the dissenting Administrative Member's call for fresh merits adjudication was rejected. Consequent to the Third-Member opinion, the Revenue's appeal is dismissed and the addition in the assessee's hands deleted.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.