Governmental authority status supports construction-service exemption, while pre-cutoff contract and stamp-duty compliance requires verification on re...
Automated Free Sale and Commerce Certificates enable paperless processing while retaining risk-based manual verification for selected exporter applica...
Employee stock-shortage penalties do not constitute consideration for services, preventing GST collection under Schedule II in employment relationship...
HC allowed the petition, set aside the impugned order dated 28.06.2024 and remitted the matter to the liquidator for adjudication on merits of the Petitioner's claim for Rs. 21,94,745/-. The HC held the liquidator's rejection of the Claim Statement as hyper-technical and unjustified for a two-day marginal delay, and emphasized the liquidator's fiduciary, non-partisan role. The HC recognized the Petitioner as a "secured creditor" under Section 3(30) of the IBC and reiterated that provident fund, pension and gratuity dues fall outside the liquidation estate under Section 36. The liquidator is directed to adjudicate the claim in accordance with the IBC and the Liquidation Regulations.
HC allowed the petition, set aside the impugned order dated 28.06.2024 and remitted the matter to the liquidator for adjudication on merits of the Petitioner's claim for Rs. 21,94,745/-. The HC held the liquidator's rejection of the Claim Statement as hyper-technical and unjustified for a two-day marginal delay, and emphasized the liquidator's fiduciary, non-partisan role. The HC recognized the Petitioner as a "secured creditor" under Section 3(30) of the IBC and reiterated that provident fund, pension and gratuity dues fall outside the liquidation estate under Section 36. The liquidator is directed to adjudicate the claim in accordance with the IBC and the Liquidation Regulations.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4828 
Join Channel 
