Charitable trust registration requires a specified-violation notice; settled cash deposits and related-party payments did not justify cancellation or ...
External development charges trigger TDS under section 194C, while disputed administrative payments require factual verification and fresh adjudicatio...
Section 270AA penalty immunity requires identified statutory defaults and a hearing before rejection; reassessment disclosure may constitute under-rep...
Section 80JJAA employee-cost deduction allowed for deployed staff but barred against transfer-pricing income enhancement, with pricing issues remanded...
Transfer-pricing methodology protects commercially genuine associated-enterprise payments, while pre-2016 secondary adjustments and related notional i...
Negative liens over operating assets can constitute international transactions requiring arm's-length pricing reflecting restricted borrowing and expa...
Cross-examination rights in Customs Broker revocation inquiries require witness examination; procedural denial may be cured through fresh adjudication...
HC allowed the petition, set aside the impugned order dated 28.06.2024 and remitted the matter to the liquidator for adjudication on merits of the Petitioner's claim for Rs. 21,94,745/-. The HC held the liquidator's rejection of the Claim Statement as hyper-technical and unjustified for a two-day marginal delay, and emphasized the liquidator's fiduciary, non-partisan role. The HC recognized the Petitioner as a "secured creditor" under Section 3(30) of the IBC and reiterated that provident fund, pension and gratuity dues fall outside the liquidation estate under Section 36. The liquidator is directed to adjudicate the claim in accordance with the IBC and the Liquidation Regulations.
HC allowed the petition, set aside the impugned order dated 28.06.2024 and remitted the matter to the liquidator for adjudication on merits of the Petitioner's claim for Rs. 21,94,745/-. The HC held the liquidator's rejection of the Claim Statement as hyper-technical and unjustified for a two-day marginal delay, and emphasized the liquidator's fiduciary, non-partisan role. The HC recognized the Petitioner as a "secured creditor" under Section 3(30) of the IBC and reiterated that provident fund, pension and gratuity dues fall outside the liquidation estate under Section 36. The liquidator is directed to adjudicate the claim in accordance with the IBC and the Liquidation Regulations.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4828 
Join Channel 
