Charitable trust registration requires a specified-violation notice; settled cash deposits and related-party payments did not justify cancellation or ...
External development charges trigger TDS under section 194C, while disputed administrative payments require factual verification and fresh adjudicatio...
Section 270AA penalty immunity requires identified statutory defaults and a hearing before rejection; reassessment disclosure may constitute under-rep...
Section 80JJAA employee-cost deduction allowed for deployed staff but barred against transfer-pricing income enhancement, with pricing issues remanded...
Transfer-pricing methodology protects commercially genuine associated-enterprise payments, while pre-2016 secondary adjustments and related notional i...
Negative liens over operating assets can constitute international transactions requiring arm's-length pricing reflecting restricted borrowing and expa...
Cross-examination rights in Customs Broker revocation inquiries require witness examination; procedural denial may be cured through fresh adjudication...
The HC held that the 16-day delay in filing the appeal constitutes sufficient cause and is within the one-month period contemplated by s.107(4) of the CGST Act; accordingly, the delay is condoned under the court's writ jurisdiction. The rectification application will not be summarily rejected for delay. Costs of Rs.5,000 are imposed on the Petitioner to be paid to the GST Department. The appeal is restored to its number before the Appellate Authority. The court noted that while earlier authority declined condonation beyond statutory periods, it may, in appropriate cases, exercise discretion to condone delay where sufficient cause is shown.
The HC held that the 16-day delay in filing the appeal constitutes sufficient cause and is within the one-month period contemplated by s.107(4) of the CGST Act; accordingly, the delay is condoned under the court's writ jurisdiction. The rectification application will not be summarily rejected for delay. Costs of Rs.5,000 are imposed on the Petitioner to be paid to the GST Department. The appeal is restored to its number before the Appellate Authority. The court noted that while earlier authority declined condonation beyond statutory periods, it may, in appropriate cases, exercise discretion to condone delay where sufficient cause is shown.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4828 
Join Channel 
