Development agreements require legal possession or effective enjoyment for capital gains transfer; permissive possession and deferred consideration de...
Prolonged sterilisation of development rights supports capital-gains treatment, while business-income disallowances cannot govern capital-gains comput...
Additional evidence in transfer pricing dispute leads to fresh examination, while tax deductions, TDS credit, fee and refund interest require verifica...
Category II AIF pass-through taxation preserves non-business income character; investment receipts cannot be reclassified without applying recognised ...
HC held that once a deemed stay under Section 107 of the GST Act operates, there is no statutory authority to continue provisional attachment or restraint of funds. The petitioner was directed to furnish an undertaking to the 3rd respondent to retain all amounts refunded and any future sale proceeds in the petitioner's bank account until disposal of the appeal, and to maintain a minimum balance of Rs.245 crores after adjusting Rs.24.4 crores treated as pre-deposit. The petitioner must also undertake to keep intact the refunded portion of Rs.170 crores recovered earlier until the appeal is finally disposed of. Petition disposed of.
HC held that once a deemed stay under Section 107 of the GST Act operates, there is no statutory authority to continue provisional attachment or restraint of funds. The petitioner was directed to furnish an undertaking to the 3rd respondent to retain all amounts refunded and any future sale proceeds in the petitioner's bank account until disposal of the appeal, and to maintain a minimum balance of Rs.245 crores after adjusting Rs.24.4 crores treated as pre-deposit. The petitioner must also undertake to keep intact the refunded portion of Rs.170 crores recovered earlier until the appeal is finally disposed of. Petition disposed of.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4805
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
