Patent-settlement expenditure treated as commercially expedient revenue outlay, with foreign-law restrictions inapplicable before the prospective amen...
International transaction benchmarking restricts transfer pricing adjustments to associated-enterprise dealings, while functional comparability govern...
Joint development agreements defer taxable transfer where possession lacks part performance, while completed flats determine consideration and exempti...
Passenger baggage re-export requires true declaration and cannot be granted indirectly through discretionary redemption of undeclared prohibited goods...
HC held that once a deemed stay under Section 107 of the GST Act operates, there is no statutory authority to continue provisional attachment or restraint of funds. The petitioner was directed to furnish an undertaking to the 3rd respondent to retain all amounts refunded and any future sale proceeds in the petitioner's bank account until disposal of the appeal, and to maintain a minimum balance of Rs.245 crores after adjusting Rs.24.4 crores treated as pre-deposit. The petitioner must also undertake to keep intact the refunded portion of Rs.170 crores recovered earlier until the appeal is finally disposed of. Petition disposed of.
HC held that once a deemed stay under Section 107 of the GST Act operates, there is no statutory authority to continue provisional attachment or restraint of funds. The petitioner was directed to furnish an undertaking to the 3rd respondent to retain all amounts refunded and any future sale proceeds in the petitioner's bank account until disposal of the appeal, and to maintain a minimum balance of Rs.245 crores after adjusting Rs.24.4 crores treated as pre-deposit. The petitioner must also undertake to keep intact the refunded portion of Rs.170 crores recovered earlier until the appeal is finally disposed of. Petition disposed of.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4801
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
