Bona fide disclosure requirements govern under-reporting penalties, and post-penalty immunity applications cannot secure available statutory protectio...
Certificate-of-origin verification procedure governs preferential customs benefits; denial without retroactive verification was set aside with consequ...
Disciplinary Committee jurisdiction and mandatory investigation requirements invalidated cancellation of an insolvency professional's registration and...
The HC directed impleader of the State GST Commissioner, Rudraprayag, as party respondent to resolve crediting of a rejected refund, noting IGST was deposited at export and reflected in GSTR-01/03; the State may engage counsel or appear virtually, and the registry is to issue notice to the Standing Counsel. The petition is restored to its original number and not disposed; the petitioner may file an undertaking as per the State GST office's order for re-crediting the refund. A GSTIN representative undertook to liaise with the State GST Department to clarify the position. Matter listed for further hearing on 31 October 2025.
The HC directed impleader of the State GST Commissioner, Rudraprayag, as party respondent to resolve crediting of a rejected refund, noting IGST was deposited at export and reflected in GSTR-01/03; the State may engage counsel or appear virtually, and the registry is to issue notice to the Standing Counsel. The petition is restored to its original number and not disposed; the petitioner may file an undertaking as per the State GST office's order for re-crediting the refund. A GSTIN representative undertook to liaise with the State GST Department to clarify the position. Matter listed for further hearing on 31 October 2025.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4805
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
