Transaction value rejection requires reliable corroboration; refundable VAT is excluded and temporary registration does not defeat new-vehicle exempti...
Appellate jurisdiction remains available where a wrist-worn gold ornament cannot conclusively be characterised as imported baggage at the preliminary ...
Written complaint requirement bars cognizance on police reports for securities offences, while unsupported breach of trust and cheating allegations fa...
Page of 4801
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
341 to 360 of 96001 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
The HC directed impleader of the State GST Commissioner, Rudraprayag, as party respondent to resolve crediting of a rejected refund, noting IGST was deposited at export and reflected in GSTR-01/03; the State may engage counsel or appear virtually, and the registry is to issue notice to the Standing Counsel. The petition is restored to its original number and not disposed; the petitioner may file an undertaking as per the State GST office's order for re-crediting the refund. A GSTIN representative undertook to liaise with the State GST Department to clarify the position. Matter listed for further hearing on 31 October 2025.
The HC directed impleader of the State GST Commissioner, Rudraprayag, as party respondent to resolve crediting of a rejected refund, noting IGST was deposited at export and reflected in GSTR-01/03; the State may engage counsel or appear virtually, and the registry is to issue notice to the Standing Counsel. The petition is restored to its original number and not disposed; the petitioner may file an undertaking as per the State GST office's order for re-crediting the refund. A GSTIN representative undertook to liaise with the State GST Department to clarify the position. Matter listed for further hearing on 31 October 2025.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4801
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
