Admissibility of electronic evidence bars undervaluation demands where printouts, retracted statements and no cross-examination leave the case unprove...
Limitation in oppression and mismanagement proceedings: prior knowledge of removal and dilution barred the challenge, with valuation directions upheld...
Insolvency professional agency governance rules amended to add nominee directors, tighten independent director eligibility, and regulate managing dire...
The HC directed impleader of the State GST Commissioner, Rudraprayag, as party respondent to resolve crediting of a rejected refund, noting IGST was deposited at export and reflected in GSTR-01/03; the State may engage counsel or appear virtually, and the registry is to issue notice to the Standing Counsel. The petition is restored to its original number and not disposed; the petitioner may file an undertaking as per the State GST office's order for re-crediting the refund. A GSTIN representative undertook to liaise with the State GST Department to clarify the position. Matter listed for further hearing on 31 October 2025.
The HC directed impleader of the State GST Commissioner, Rudraprayag, as party respondent to resolve crediting of a rejected refund, noting IGST was deposited at export and reflected in GSTR-01/03; the State may engage counsel or appear virtually, and the registry is to issue notice to the Standing Counsel. The petition is restored to its original number and not disposed; the petitioner may file an undertaking as per the State GST office's order for re-crediting the refund. A GSTIN representative undertook to liaise with the State GST Department to clarify the position. Matter listed for further hearing on 31 October 2025.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4826 
Join Channel 
