Charitable trust registration requires a specified-violation notice; settled cash deposits and related-party payments did not justify cancellation or ...
External development charges trigger TDS under section 194C, while disputed administrative payments require factual verification and fresh adjudicatio...
Section 270AA penalty immunity requires identified statutory defaults and a hearing before rejection; reassessment disclosure may constitute under-rep...
Section 80JJAA employee-cost deduction allowed for deployed staff but barred against transfer-pricing income enhancement, with pricing issues remanded...
Transfer-pricing methodology protects commercially genuine associated-enterprise payments, while pre-2016 secondary adjustments and related notional i...
Negative liens over operating assets can constitute international transactions requiring arm's-length pricing reflecting restricted borrowing and expa...
Cross-examination rights in Customs Broker revocation inquiries require witness examination; procedural denial may be cured through fresh adjudication...
The HC allowed the petition, holding that the ITAT exceeded jurisdiction by invoking s.254(2) to rectify its earlier order on the basis of a subsequent SC decision. The Court held s.254(2) permits correction only of a mistake apparent from the record as it stood when the original order was rendered, and a later judicial pronouncement does not constitute such a mistake. Accordingly, the HC quashed the ITAT order passed under s.254(2) and restored the original position, finding no error apparent on the record when the Tribunal's initial order was delivered; the AO's intimation under s.143(1) and the disallowance under s.36(1)(va) remain unaffected.
The HC allowed the petition, holding that the ITAT exceeded jurisdiction by invoking s.254(2) to rectify its earlier order on the basis of a subsequent SC decision. The Court held s.254(2) permits correction only of a mistake apparent from the record as it stood when the original order was rendered, and a later judicial pronouncement does not constitute such a mistake. Accordingly, the HC quashed the ITAT order passed under s.254(2) and restored the original position, finding no error apparent on the record when the Tribunal's initial order was delivered; the AO's intimation under s.143(1) and the disallowance under s.36(1)(va) remain unaffected.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4828 
Join Channel 
