Charitable trust registration requires a specified-violation notice; settled cash deposits and related-party payments did not justify cancellation or ...
External development charges trigger TDS under section 194C, while disputed administrative payments require factual verification and fresh adjudicatio...
Section 270AA penalty immunity requires identified statutory defaults and a hearing before rejection; reassessment disclosure may constitute under-rep...
Section 80JJAA employee-cost deduction allowed for deployed staff but barred against transfer-pricing income enhancement, with pricing issues remanded...
Transfer-pricing methodology protects commercially genuine associated-enterprise payments, while pre-2016 secondary adjustments and related notional i...
Negative liens over operating assets can constitute international transactions requiring arm's-length pricing reflecting restricted borrowing and expa...
Cross-examination rights in Customs Broker revocation inquiries require witness examination; procedural denial may be cured through fresh adjudication...
The ITAT allowed the assessee's appeal, holding that the assessee was entitled to exemption under section 54F for long-term capital gains. The Tribunal found that the entire sale consideration had been bona fide invested in acquisition of a plot for construction, and delay in commencement/completion beyond the three-year period was attributable to factors beyond the assessee's control (not the assessee's default). Given that the assessee ultimately relinquished rights in the original plot and reinvested the recovered proceeds in a residential property, and that section 54F is a beneficial provision, the assessee could not be disentitled from the exemption; relief granted.
The ITAT allowed the assessee's appeal, holding that the assessee was entitled to exemption under section 54F for long-term capital gains. The Tribunal found that the entire sale consideration had been bona fide invested in acquisition of a plot for construction, and delay in commencement/completion beyond the three-year period was attributable to factors beyond the assessee's control (not the assessee's default). Given that the assessee ultimately relinquished rights in the original plot and reinvested the recovered proceeds in a residential property, and that section 54F is a beneficial provision, the assessee could not be disentitled from the exemption; relief granted.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.