Transfer-pricing treatment of ITeS margins excludes pass-through tax recoveries and separate delayed-receivables interest after working-capital adjust...
Capacity-utilisation adjustments under TNMM can neutralise substantiated COVID-related idle costs where underutilisation materially affects profitabil...
TNMM functional comparability requires excluding rice manufacturers from a pure Basmati rice trader's benchmark and recognising operating export recei...
Working-capital adjustment subsumes delayed-receivable effects in TNMM benchmarking of captive software-development services, avoiding separate notion...
Transfer-pricing comparability requires exclusion of financially illogical super-profit comparables and correction of unsupported annual-report and ma...
Charitable character assessment preserves Section 80G approval despite inclusive spiritual teachings and incidental religious expenditure within the s...
Penalty proceedings for cash-loan acceptance require assessment proceedings and recorded Assessing Officer satisfaction; absent these, the proceedings...
Page of 4828
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
161 to 180 of 96556 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
The ITAT, adjudicating an appeal against an assessment completed u/s 143(3) r.w.s. 144B, held that interest income on fixed deposits was not excluded by the mutuality principle and had been correctly set off against maintenance expenses by the assessee as previously adjudicated in the assessee's own earlier year. The tribunal found the surplus, after set-off, was disclosed in the return and had been offered to tax; accordingly, the Assessing Officer's addition of the FD interest and the surplus upheld by the CIT(A) were unsustainable. The entire addition in respect of interest income on FDs is deleted and the assessee's grounds are allowed.
The ITAT, adjudicating an appeal against an assessment completed u/s 143(3) r.w.s. 144B, held that interest income on fixed deposits was not excluded by the mutuality principle and had been correctly set off against maintenance expenses by the assessee as previously adjudicated in the assessee's own earlier year. The tribunal found the surplus, after set-off, was disclosed in the return and had been offered to tax; accordingly, the Assessing Officer's addition of the FD interest and the surplus upheld by the CIT(A) were unsustainable. The entire addition in respect of interest income on FDs is deleted and the assessee's grounds are allowed.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.