Alternative statutory remedy and unexplained delay barred writ review of customs confiscation adjudication, leaving merits for appellate consideration...
Authorised courier due diligence protects against penalties where declared exports conceal prohibited goods despite proper documentation and customs p...
Customs-controlled container movement now extends to DP World facilities, subject to segregation, inspections, reconciliation, and EXIM cargo priority...
The Appellate Tribunal disposed of the appeal, holding that the NCLT possessed jurisdiction under Section 242(4) to pass interim orders regulating the company's affairs, but such orders must be predicated on cogent circumstances to secure substantial justice. The Tribunal upheld the NCLT's refusal to direct examination of time-barred (2015) records, criticised the impugned directive to appoint a forensic auditor to probe six years without adequate supporting material, and found the Respondent's claim of lack of access to financial statements frivolous. No finding of siphoning of funds, denial of information or lack of probity was made, and no winding-up or forensic mandate beyond permissible limitation was sustained.
The Appellate Tribunal disposed of the appeal, holding that the NCLT possessed jurisdiction under Section 242(4) to pass interim orders regulating the company's affairs, but such orders must be predicated on cogent circumstances to secure substantial justice. The Tribunal upheld the NCLT's refusal to direct examination of time-barred (2015) records, criticised the impugned directive to appoint a forensic auditor to probe six years without adequate supporting material, and found the Respondent's claim of lack of access to financial statements frivolous. No finding of siphoning of funds, denial of information or lack of probity was made, and no winding-up or forensic mandate beyond permissible limitation was sustained.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4828 
Join Channel 
