Charitable trust registration requires a specified-violation notice; settled cash deposits and related-party payments did not justify cancellation or ...
External development charges trigger TDS under section 194C, while disputed administrative payments require factual verification and fresh adjudicatio...
Section 270AA penalty immunity requires identified statutory defaults and a hearing before rejection; reassessment disclosure may constitute under-rep...
Section 80JJAA employee-cost deduction allowed for deployed staff but barred against transfer-pricing income enhancement, with pricing issues remanded...
Transfer-pricing methodology protects commercially genuine associated-enterprise payments, while pre-2016 secondary adjustments and related notional i...
Negative liens over operating assets can constitute international transactions requiring arm's-length pricing reflecting restricted borrowing and expa...
Cross-examination rights in Customs Broker revocation inquiries require witness examination; procedural denial may be cured through fresh adjudication...
The HC affirmed the Tribunal's factual finding that the product (Byozyme) was correctly characterized for sales-tax purposes in favour of the assessee, holding that the Tribunal's conclusion was supported by admissible evidence, not perverse, and did not result from exclusion of relevant material or misapplication of legal principles. The Court emphasized its limited reference jurisdiction and declined to reappraise evidence merely because an alternative view was possible, finding no error on primary facts or in law warranting interference. Consequently the reference was answered in favour of the assessee and the Revenue's challenge was dismissed; the matter is disposed of.
The HC affirmed the Tribunal's factual finding that the product (Byozyme) was correctly characterized for sales-tax purposes in favour of the assessee, holding that the Tribunal's conclusion was supported by admissible evidence, not perverse, and did not result from exclusion of relevant material or misapplication of legal principles. The Court emphasized its limited reference jurisdiction and declined to reappraise evidence merely because an alternative view was possible, finding no error on primary facts or in law warranting interference. Consequently the reference was answered in favour of the assessee and the Revenue's challenge was dismissed; the matter is disposed of.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4828 
Join Channel 
