Specialized Investment Fund distribution now requires dedicated certification, while transitional recognition preserves existing qualified distributor...
Overlapping GST proceedings require Central and State authorities to designate one competent authority for coordinated adjudication of the same matter...
Composite healthcare supplies retain exemption when patient care is the contract's essential character, despite payment through an implementing agency...
The HC allowed the petition, set aside the impugned order dated 06.01.2025 and remanded the matter to the AO for fresh proceedings in accordance with law. The court accepted that although an appeal had been initially rejected on limitation grounds, the validity of the underlying order was vitiated by non-inclusion of the DIN as required under the GST Act and related administrative instructions; consequently the impugned order is treated as invalid and requires fresh adjudication. The AO is directed to proceed afresh, ensuring statutory formalities (including DIN compliance) are observed and to decide the matter on merits within the statutory framework.
The HC allowed the petition, set aside the impugned order dated 06.01.2025 and remanded the matter to the AO for fresh proceedings in accordance with law. The court accepted that although an appeal had been initially rejected on limitation grounds, the validity of the underlying order was vitiated by non-inclusion of the DIN as required under the GST Act and related administrative instructions; consequently the impugned order is treated as invalid and requires fresh adjudication. The AO is directed to proceed afresh, ensuring statutory formalities (including DIN compliance) are observed and to decide the matter on merits within the statutory framework.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4805
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
