Admissibility of electronic evidence bars undervaluation demands where printouts, retracted statements and no cross-examination leave the case unprove...
Limitation in oppression and mismanagement proceedings: prior knowledge of removal and dilution barred the challenge, with valuation directions upheld...
Insolvency professional agency governance rules amended to add nominee directors, tighten independent director eligibility, and regulate managing dire...
The HC allowed the petition, set aside the impugned order dated 06.01.2025 and remanded the matter to the AO for fresh proceedings in accordance with law. The court accepted that although an appeal had been initially rejected on limitation grounds, the validity of the underlying order was vitiated by non-inclusion of the DIN as required under the GST Act and related administrative instructions; consequently the impugned order is treated as invalid and requires fresh adjudication. The AO is directed to proceed afresh, ensuring statutory formalities (including DIN compliance) are observed and to decide the matter on merits within the statutory framework.
The HC allowed the petition, set aside the impugned order dated 06.01.2025 and remanded the matter to the AO for fresh proceedings in accordance with law. The court accepted that although an appeal had been initially rejected on limitation grounds, the validity of the underlying order was vitiated by non-inclusion of the DIN as required under the GST Act and related administrative instructions; consequently the impugned order is treated as invalid and requires fresh adjudication. The AO is directed to proceed afresh, ensuring statutory formalities (including DIN compliance) are observed and to decide the matter on merits within the statutory framework.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4819 
Join Channel 
