Charitable trust registration requires a specified-violation notice; settled cash deposits and related-party payments did not justify cancellation or ...
External development charges trigger TDS under section 194C, while disputed administrative payments require factual verification and fresh adjudicatio...
Section 270AA penalty immunity requires identified statutory defaults and a hearing before rejection; reassessment disclosure may constitute under-rep...
Section 80JJAA employee-cost deduction allowed for deployed staff but barred against transfer-pricing income enhancement, with pricing issues remanded...
Transfer-pricing methodology protects commercially genuine associated-enterprise payments, while pre-2016 secondary adjustments and related notional i...
Negative liens over operating assets can constitute international transactions requiring arm's-length pricing reflecting restricted borrowing and expa...
Cross-examination rights in Customs Broker revocation inquiries require witness examination; procedural denial may be cured through fresh adjudication...
The NCLAT dismissed the appeals and upheld the impugned order, rejecting the appellants' claims for delay and for characterization as homebuyers. The Tribunal found appellants failed to discharge the burden of proof as there was no evidence of transfer of funds into the corporate debtor's bank accounts and no documentary acknowledgement by the corporate debtor. The purported payment receipt lacked date, witness, signature, stamp or reference and was held to be of no evidentiary value; the relied agreement was unregistered and unexecuted. In view of these deficiencies and absence of error in the impugned order, the appeals are devoid of merit and stand dismissed.
The NCLAT dismissed the appeals and upheld the impugned order, rejecting the appellants' claims for delay and for characterization as homebuyers. The Tribunal found appellants failed to discharge the burden of proof as there was no evidence of transfer of funds into the corporate debtor's bank accounts and no documentary acknowledgement by the corporate debtor. The purported payment receipt lacked date, witness, signature, stamp or reference and was held to be of no evidentiary value; the relied agreement was unregistered and unexecuted. In view of these deficiencies and absence of error in the impugned order, the appeals are devoid of merit and stand dismissed.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.