Online bond platforms may offer overseas-regulated products and tax-specific bonds subject to disclosures, compliance safeguards and revised complianc...
Corporate guarantee valuation permits actual ascertainable commission while barring retroactive application and extended-period penalties for bona fid...
Proper-officer jurisdiction under UPGST penalty provisions upheld; participation on merits prevents bypassing the statutory appellate remedy through w...
Transitioned CENVAT credit may validly satisfy mandatory pre-deposit requirements for legacy service tax appeals through Electronic Credit Ledger debi...
Building-plan sanction charges require statutory authority; unauthorised fees and GST were quashed, while labour cess must follow prescribed collectio...
Pure-agent exclusion fails where hotel booking facilitators receive third-party services themselves, making entire customer consideration taxable as r...
The HC set aside impugned composite show-cause notices and assessment orders for consolidating multiple tax periods, holding that a single SCN or composite assessment cannot cover more than one tax period (monthly or annual as applicable) and that separate assessments must be framed for each assessment year; divergence in High Courts' precedents noted but statutory interpretation, read with related provisions and the rights to benefits and appeals under the GST framework, requires distinct orders per period. The writ petitions were disposed of, quashing the composite orders and permitting respondents to initiate fresh proceedings confined to each assessment year separately.
The HC set aside impugned composite show-cause notices and assessment orders for consolidating multiple tax periods, holding that a single SCN or composite assessment cannot cover more than one tax period (monthly or annual as applicable) and that separate assessments must be framed for each assessment year; divergence in High Courts' precedents noted but statutory interpretation, read with related provisions and the rights to benefits and appeals under the GST framework, requires distinct orders per period. The writ petitions were disposed of, quashing the composite orders and permitting respondents to initiate fresh proceedings confined to each assessment year separately.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.