Patent-settlement expenditure treated as commercially expedient revenue outlay, with foreign-law restrictions inapplicable before the prospective amen...
International transaction benchmarking restricts transfer pricing adjustments to associated-enterprise dealings, while functional comparability govern...
Joint development agreements defer taxable transfer where possession lacks part performance, while completed flats determine consideration and exempti...
Passenger baggage re-export requires true declaration and cannot be granted indirectly through discretionary redemption of undeclared prohibited goods...
Page of 4803
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
501 to 520 of 96046 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
The HC dismissed the petition as prematurely maintainable, holding that the Trade Circular dated 13 August 2024 sufficiently protects the Petitioner and affords an efficacious alternative remedy. The Petitioner, having filed this petition on 17 April 2025 within the period prescribed by the Circular, must submit the Annexure-1 form within four weeks of upload of this order to avail the Circular's benefits. The court directed that once the GST Tribunal is constituted and functional, the Petitioner may pursue an appeal against the impugned order dated 24 February 2025; failure on appeal will not foreclose the Petitioner's liberty to subsequently challenge the constitutional validity of Section 16(2)(c). Petition disposed.
The HC dismissed the petition as prematurely maintainable, holding that the Trade Circular dated 13 August 2024 sufficiently protects the Petitioner and affords an efficacious alternative remedy. The Petitioner, having filed this petition on 17 April 2025 within the period prescribed by the Circular, must submit the Annexure-1 form within four weeks of upload of this order to avail the Circular's benefits. The court directed that once the GST Tribunal is constituted and functional, the Petitioner may pursue an appeal against the impugned order dated 24 February 2025; failure on appeal will not foreclose the Petitioner's liberty to subsequently challenge the constitutional validity of Section 16(2)(c). Petition disposed.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.