Transaction value rejection requires reliable corroboration; refundable VAT is excluded and temporary registration does not defeat new-vehicle exempti...
Appellate jurisdiction remains available where a wrist-worn gold ornament cannot conclusively be characterised as imported baggage at the preliminary ...
Written complaint requirement bars cognizance on police reports for securities offences, while unsupported breach of trust and cheating allegations fa...
Page of 4801
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
341 to 360 of 96001 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
The HC dismissed the petition as prematurely maintainable, holding that the Trade Circular dated 13 August 2024 sufficiently protects the Petitioner and affords an efficacious alternative remedy. The Petitioner, having filed this petition on 17 April 2025 within the period prescribed by the Circular, must submit the Annexure-1 form within four weeks of upload of this order to avail the Circular's benefits. The court directed that once the GST Tribunal is constituted and functional, the Petitioner may pursue an appeal against the impugned order dated 24 February 2025; failure on appeal will not foreclose the Petitioner's liberty to subsequently challenge the constitutional validity of Section 16(2)(c). Petition disposed.
The HC dismissed the petition as prematurely maintainable, holding that the Trade Circular dated 13 August 2024 sufficiently protects the Petitioner and affords an efficacious alternative remedy. The Petitioner, having filed this petition on 17 April 2025 within the period prescribed by the Circular, must submit the Annexure-1 form within four weeks of upload of this order to avail the Circular's benefits. The court directed that once the GST Tribunal is constituted and functional, the Petitioner may pursue an appeal against the impugned order dated 24 February 2025; failure on appeal will not foreclose the Petitioner's liberty to subsequently challenge the constitutional validity of Section 16(2)(c). Petition disposed.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.