Development agreements require legal possession or effective enjoyment for capital gains transfer; permissive possession and deferred consideration de...
Prolonged sterilisation of development rights supports capital-gains treatment, while business-income disallowances cannot govern capital-gains comput...
Additional evidence in transfer pricing dispute leads to fresh examination, while tax deductions, TDS credit, fee and refund interest require verifica...
Category II AIF pass-through taxation preserves non-business income character; investment receipts cannot be reclassified without applying recognised ...
Mutual fund maturity rules require proper rollover, redemption, disclosure, and due diligence; investor gains cannot excuse regulatory breaches or pen...
The HC allowed the petition in part, setting aside impugned orders and remanding the matters to the Appellate Authority for fresh adjudication. The court held that the Appellate Authority, under Section 107(11) of the CGST Act, has power to confirm, modify or annul orders and must reconsider all refund applications collectively rather than in a staggered manner. The HC found that determinations on entitlement to refund of unutilised input tax credit for zero-rated supplies turned on documentary proof and the nature of exported services; inconsistent, piecemeal decisions produced irreconcilable outcomes. The remand directs the Appellate Authority to reassess refund claims afresh and decide consistently.
The HC allowed the petition in part, setting aside impugned orders and remanding the matters to the Appellate Authority for fresh adjudication. The court held that the Appellate Authority, under Section 107(11) of the CGST Act, has power to confirm, modify or annul orders and must reconsider all refund applications collectively rather than in a staggered manner. The HC found that determinations on entitlement to refund of unutilised input tax credit for zero-rated supplies turned on documentary proof and the nature of exported services; inconsistent, piecemeal decisions produced irreconcilable outcomes. The remand directs the Appellate Authority to reassess refund claims afresh and decide consistently.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.