Charitable trust registration requires a specified-violation notice; settled cash deposits and related-party payments did not justify cancellation or ...
External development charges trigger TDS under section 194C, while disputed administrative payments require factual verification and fresh adjudicatio...
Section 270AA penalty immunity requires identified statutory defaults and a hearing before rejection; reassessment disclosure may constitute under-rep...
Section 80JJAA employee-cost deduction allowed for deployed staff but barred against transfer-pricing income enhancement, with pricing issues remanded...
Transfer-pricing methodology protects commercially genuine associated-enterprise payments, while pre-2016 secondary adjustments and related notional i...
Negative liens over operating assets can constitute international transactions requiring arm's-length pricing reflecting restricted borrowing and expa...
Cross-examination rights in Customs Broker revocation inquiries require witness examination; procedural denial may be cured through fresh adjudication...
The HC held that the reassessment proceedings were without jurisdiction and must be quashed because the requisite sanction under the substituted s.151 regime was not obtained from the authority specified in s.151(ii) after the three-year period expired. TOLA extended the sanction window only to 30.06.2021; the impugned order under s.148A(d) dated 18.08.2022 and the s.148 notice dated 23.08.2022 were therefore preceded by approval from Respondent No.2 who was not the appropriate approving authority under s.151(ii). Non-compliance with s.148A(d) read with s.151(ii) vitiates jurisdiction; accordingly the HC quashed and set aside the order and notice.
The HC held that the reassessment proceedings were without jurisdiction and must be quashed because the requisite sanction under the substituted s.151 regime was not obtained from the authority specified in s.151(ii) after the three-year period expired. TOLA extended the sanction window only to 30.06.2021; the impugned order under s.148A(d) dated 18.08.2022 and the s.148 notice dated 23.08.2022 were therefore preceded by approval from Respondent No.2 who was not the appropriate approving authority under s.151(ii). Non-compliance with s.148A(d) read with s.151(ii) vitiates jurisdiction; accordingly the HC quashed and set aside the order and notice.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4828 
Join Channel 
