Charitable trust registration requires a specified-violation notice; settled cash deposits and related-party payments did not justify cancellation or ...
External development charges trigger TDS under section 194C, while disputed administrative payments require factual verification and fresh adjudicatio...
Section 270AA penalty immunity requires identified statutory defaults and a hearing before rejection; reassessment disclosure may constitute under-rep...
Section 80JJAA employee-cost deduction allowed for deployed staff but barred against transfer-pricing income enhancement, with pricing issues remanded...
Transfer-pricing methodology protects commercially genuine associated-enterprise payments, while pre-2016 secondary adjustments and related notional i...
Negative liens over operating assets can constitute international transactions requiring arm's-length pricing reflecting restricted borrowing and expa...
Cross-examination rights in Customs Broker revocation inquiries require witness examination; procedural denial may be cured through fresh adjudication...
The HC directed respondents to permit the petitioner to file income-tax returns for AYs 2021-22 to 2023-24 in Form ITR-2 by manual mode and to treat such filings as returns filed under Section 139(1) of the IT Act. The court ordered respondents to accept, until the e-filing system is amended by the CBDT, manual ITR-2 filings for all private discretionary trusts. The HC declined to mandate further systemic changes while noting the CBDT's ongoing adjustments. The HC also recognized that private discretionary trusts are entitled to be assessed as individual persons for income-tax purposes, in line with established departmental position.
The HC directed respondents to permit the petitioner to file income-tax returns for AYs 2021-22 to 2023-24 in Form ITR-2 by manual mode and to treat such filings as returns filed under Section 139(1) of the IT Act. The court ordered respondents to accept, until the e-filing system is amended by the CBDT, manual ITR-2 filings for all private discretionary trusts. The HC declined to mandate further systemic changes while noting the CBDT's ongoing adjustments. The HC also recognized that private discretionary trusts are entitled to be assessed as individual persons for income-tax purposes, in line with established departmental position.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.