Transfer-pricing treatment of ITeS margins excludes pass-through tax recoveries and separate delayed-receivables interest after working-capital adjust...
Capacity-utilisation adjustments under TNMM can neutralise substantiated COVID-related idle costs where underutilisation materially affects profitabil...
TNMM functional comparability requires excluding rice manufacturers from a pure Basmati rice trader's benchmark and recognising operating export recei...
Working-capital adjustment subsumes delayed-receivable effects in TNMM benchmarking of captive software-development services, avoiding separate notion...
Transfer-pricing comparability requires exclusion of financially illogical super-profit comparables and correction of unsupported annual-report and ma...
Charitable character assessment preserves Section 80G approval despite inclusive spiritual teachings and incidental religious expenditure within the s...
Penalty proceedings for cash-loan acceptance require assessment proceedings and recorded Assessing Officer satisfaction; absent these, the proceedings...
Page of 4828
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
161 to 180 of 96556 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
The ITAT affirmed that the TPO lawfully included Comparable Company A in the comparable set for transfer pricing purposes, finding functional comparability with the assessee's provision of IT-enabled services notwithstanding lower turnover, and held that the CIT(A)'s exclusion was unsustainable. The ITAT also addressed the CIT(A)'s direction regarding Comparable Companies B and C and the working-capital adjustment, noting the assessee's appeal-effect submission to the AO; the impugned orders were set aside and the matter remanded to the AO for fresh adjudication on those issues. The appeal is allowed in part for statistical purposes, with directions for reconsideration consistent with the Tribunal's findings.
The ITAT affirmed that the TPO lawfully included Comparable Company A in the comparable set for transfer pricing purposes, finding functional comparability with the assessee's provision of IT-enabled services notwithstanding lower turnover, and held that the CIT(A)'s exclusion was unsustainable. The ITAT also addressed the CIT(A)'s direction regarding Comparable Companies B and C and the working-capital adjustment, noting the assessee's appeal-effect submission to the AO; the impugned orders were set aside and the matter remanded to the AO for fresh adjudication on those issues. The appeal is allowed in part for statistical purposes, with directions for reconsideration consistent with the Tribunal's findings.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.